NHS Trusts

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust: Pay, CQC Rating & Staff Survey

FP FrontlinePay Editorial
Updated September 2026

Independent guidance — not affiliated with NHS England or DHSC

Short answer

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust pays on the same national Agenda for Change bands as any other NHS mental health trust, and — because East Sussex, West Sussex and Brighton and Hove all sit outside any HCAS zone — no High Cost Area Supplement applies here. Its overall CQC rating is Good (Outstanding for caring), but that needs weighing against a formal CQC warning notice served in July 2025 over crisis-service safety, and a genuinely difficult 2025 NHS Staff Survey in which only 48% of staff said they'd recommend the trust as a place to work and 37% said they'd thought about leaving — the worst result in the country on that measure. We report both the positives and these concerns honestly below. Use the NHS Pay Calculator for your exact figure.

What the trust actually runs today

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust provides mental health, learning disability and neurodevelopmental services to people living across East Sussex, West Sussex and Brighton and Hove — for children and young people, adults of working age, and older people. Care is delivered across a genuinely wide range of settings: people's own homes, specialist clinics, hospitals, low and medium secure units and GP surgeries, alongside its main inpatient hospital sites (covered below). The trust is part of the Sussex Integrated Care System, and it holds research links with the Centre for Dementia Studies at Brighton and Sussex Medical School.

Mental health nursing at this trust follows exactly the same Agenda for Change bands as any other field — see our nursing guide for how progression works from Band 5 through senior practice and leadership roles — and allied health professionals and psychologists working across its community and neurodevelopmental services are covered in our AHP guide.

Area served

East & West Sussex + Brighton & Hove

Mental health, learning disability and neurodevelopmental services across the whole of Sussex, entirely outside any NHS HCAS zone.

Mill View, Langley Green and Meadowfield

The trust's three main adult inpatient hospitals are Mill View Hospital in Hove, Langley Green Hospital in Crawley, and Meadowfield Hospital in Worthing, alongside the Oaklands Centre for Acute Care in Chichester. Beyond these four sites, the trust runs a wide network of further community, older-adult and specialist locations, including services based in Haywards Heath, Eastbourne and Horsham, and community hospital-based units such as the Millwood Unit at Uckfield Community Hospital. This geographic spread means a role advertised with Sussex Partnership could genuinely be based anywhere from Crawley in the north of the county to Eastbourne on the south coast — always check the specific site named on a job advert rather than assuming a central Brighton base.

What makes this trust distinctive

  • Neurodevelopmental services — dedicated autism and ADHD assessment and support services delivered alongside mainstream mental health provision, a specialism with growing demand across the NHS.
  • Veteran Aware Trust status — the trust passed its one-year review as a Veteran Aware Trust as of June 2026, reflecting ongoing, externally reviewed commitment to supporting the Armed Forces community specifically.
  • Academic dementia research links — a working relationship with the Centre for Dementia Studies at Brighton and Sussex Medical School, relevant to anyone building an older adult mental health or dementia care career with a research dimension.

CQC rating and the July 2025 warning notice

The trust's overall Care Quality Commission rating is Good, from its most recent comprehensive inspection, published on the CQC's provider page for the trust (provider code RX2) on 7 June 2019 — rated Good for safe, effective, responsive and well-led, and Outstanding for caring.

CQC overall rating

Good

Outstanding for caring; most recent comprehensive rating published 7 June 2019 (CQC provider RX2). A July 2025 warning notice and more recent core-service findings are covered below and should be read alongside this headline.

That headline figure needs to sit alongside more recent, and genuinely more concerning, CQC activity. The CQC rated the trust's child and adolescent mental health wards Requires Improvement (published 27 October 2023), and rated mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety Requires Improvement, most recently published 30 April 2026. Most significantly, on 11 July 2025 the CQC issued a formal warning notice against the trust for failing to ensure that care and treatment in its mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety was consistently safe, appropriate to people's needs, respectful of privacy and dignity, and protective against avoidable harm, at five specific locations. A warning notice is a serious regulatory step requiring the trust to make specified improvements within a set timescale — it isn't the same as an overall rating downgrade, but it's a genuinely significant, current concern, and we're reporting it plainly rather than downplaying it. If you're applying for a crisis-service role specifically, check the CQC's most recent report for that named service directly before accepting an offer.

NHS Staff Survey: a genuinely difficult recent result

The trust's most recently reported NHS Staff Survey — covering results gathered in late 2025 — paints a genuinely difficult picture that we think is important to state plainly rather than soften. Some 3,152 staff responded, a 58% response rate and itself an improvement on the previous year's turnout. Within those results: only 49.6% of staff said they looked forward to going to work (down from around 54% the year before), just 48% said they would recommend the trust as a place to work, and 37% said they had thought about leaving — reported as the worst result in the country on that specific measure. Staff morale scored 5.71 out of 10 against a sector average of 6.12, and burnout scored 4.93 out of 10, described as close to the worst nationally. Just 40.86% of staff felt able to meet all the conflicting demands placed on their time, also reported as the worst result in the country on that measure, and 74% reported facing unrealistic time pressure — likewise close to the worst nationally.

⚠We're reporting this because it's genuinely significant, not to alarm you unnecessarily

The trust's own chief executive has publicly acknowledged receiving "stark feedback about people's frustrations, concerns and, in some cases, anger" from staff, and board minutes have referenced staff describing "moral injury" and frustration that waiting times were preventing the delivery of the quality of care they wanted to give. This is a genuinely below-average staff survey result on multiple specific measures, reported honestly here because it's directly relevant to anyone weighing up a role at this trust — alongside the trust's Outstanding-for-caring CQC rating, which is also genuinely true. Both facts describe the same organisation at the same point in time.

Pay, banding and why there's no HCAS

Pay at this trust runs on the same national Agenda for Change pay bands as any other NHS trust — Band 2 through Band 9, plus medical and dental scales for psychiatrists. High Cost Area Supplement applies only to London and a defined set of Fringe districts just outside the M25, mostly covering parts of Surrey, Kent, Essex and Hertfordshire — under the official NHS Agenda for Change HCAS zone map, no part of East Sussex, West Sussex or Brighton and Hove falls within any HCAS zone, Fringe included. So pay at this trust is the standard national rate for your band and point, with no location weighting applied, wherever in Sussex your specific post is based. Use the NHS Pay Calculator to see the exact national rate for your band.

Unsocial hours and crisis service rotas

Given the CQC and staff survey findings covered above, it's worth being specific: the trust's crisis and health-based places of safety services, along with its acute wards at Mill View, Langley Green and Meadowfield, run continuously, so night, weekend and bank holiday shifts are a routine part of many clinical roles here. The Unsocial Hours Calculator shows what a genuine rota pattern adds on top of band pay, which is worth checking alongside the workload and morale findings above before accepting an inpatient or crisis-service role here specifically.

This trust vs Greater Manchester Mental Health

Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GMMH) is a genuinely useful, honest comparison here — both trusts sit outside any HCAS zone, and both have had recent, serious, publicly documented concerns raised about safety and culture, which is worth confronting directly rather than only comparing trusts with clean recent records.

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust

Overall CQC rating Good (Outstanding for caring, June 2019), but a July 2025 warning notice over crisis-service safety and Requires Improvement ratings at CAMHS wards and crisis services more recently. A genuinely difficult 2025 Staff Survey: 48% would recommend as a place to work, 37% had considered leaving (worst in the country on that measure). No HCAS applies anywhere in Sussex.

Greater Manchester Mental Health (GMMH)

Overall CQC rating Inadequate, published July 2023, following the 2022 BBC Panorama exposé of abuse at its Edenfield Centre and a subsequent independent review finding a 'toxic' culture and ignored staff safety concerns over several years. A further warning notice was served in August 2026 over community mental health waiting-list oversight. No HCAS applies in Greater Manchester either. Its substance misuse services, separately, were rated Outstanding.

Neither comparison is offered to suggest one trust is simply "worse" than the other — GMMH's Inadequate rating followed a specific, extensively documented abuse scandal and a formal independent review, while Sussex Partnership's overall rating remains Good with a specific crisis-service warning notice and a difficult staff survey result. Both are genuinely serious, current concerns worth knowing before applying to either trust, and the right response for any specific candidate depends on the exact service and team in question — check the CQC's most recent report for that named service directly, and use the NHS Trust Comparison Tool to compare either trust against a role you're considering.

Weighing this trust honestly

We'd rather set out the genuine trade-offs plainly than write around them:

  • A CQC caring rating of Outstanding sits alongside genuinely serious, recent concerns about crisis-service safety and a warning notice — both are true at once.
  • The 2025 staff survey results are genuinely below sector average on several specific measures, including some of the worst-reported results in the country on leaving intentions and workload pressure — this is current, primary-sourced evidence, not an old or isolated data point.
  • Neurodevelopmental services and Veteran Aware status are genuine, specific strengths for staff interested in those particular specialisms.
  • No HCAS applies anywhere in Sussex, so total take-home pay comparisons against a London or Fringe-zone trust need to account for that gap directly.
  • The right move is service-specific research — ask directly, at interview, about staffing levels, recent CQC findings for the specific ward or team, and how the trust's leadership has responded to the 2025 survey results, rather than relying on the trust-wide headline rating alone.

Tools for working out your own numbers

Job title and trust name alone won't tell you what a specific role here is actually worth, or how the trust's current position compares with another employer you're considering — these three tools do that with your own numbers:

Your employer, not just your role

Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust is your legal employer if you work here, which is what continuous service and any redundancy pay calculation is based on. See our explainer on NHS structure for the broader picture of how trusts, ICBs and NHS England fit together.

Related guides

Frequently asked questions

Frequently asked questions

What is Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust's current CQC rating? +
Good overall, from the CQC's most recent comprehensive inspection, published 7 June 2019 (provider code RX2) — Good for safe, effective, responsive and well-led, and Outstanding for caring. That headline needs balancing against more recent, narrower findings: the CQC rated the trust's child and adolescent mental health wards Requires Improvement (published October 2023), rated its mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety Requires Improvement (most recently published 30 April 2026), and issued a formal warning notice on 11 July 2025 over safety concerns at five specific crisis-service locations. Always check the CQC's own provider page for RX2 for the current position on any specific service before relying on this for a decision.
What was the July 2025 CQC warning notice about? +
On 11 July 2025, the CQC served a warning notice on Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust for failing to ensure that care and treatment in its mental health crisis services and health-based places of safety was consistently safe, appropriate to people's needs, respectful of their privacy and dignity, and protective against avoidable harm. This is a genuinely serious regulatory step — a warning notice requires the trust to make specified improvements within a set timescale — and it's reported here factually rather than minimised. If you're applying to a crisis-service role specifically, it's worth checking the CQC's most recent report for that named service directly.
What did the 2025 NHS Staff Survey show for this trust? +
A genuinely difficult set of results, reported around 3,152 responses (58% of the workforce, itself an improvement in response rate on the previous year). Only 49.6% of staff said they looked forward to going to work (down from around 54% the year before), just 48% said they would recommend the trust as a place to work, and 37% said they had thought about leaving — reported as the worst result in the country on that specific measure. Staff morale scored 5.71 out of 10 against a sector average of 6.12, burnout scored 4.93 out of 10 (described as close to the worst nationally), and only 40.86% of staff felt able to meet all the conflicting demands on their time — also reported as the worst result in the country on that measure. The trust's chief executive has acknowledged receiving 'stark feedback about people's frustrations, concerns and, in some cases, anger.' This is reported factually because it's a genuinely significant, current data point for anyone considering a role here.
Does Sussex Partnership pay HCAS? +
No. High Cost Area Supplement applies to London and specific Fringe districts just outside it — mostly parts of Surrey, Kent, Essex and Hertfordshire — and no part of East Sussex, West Sussex or Brighton and Hove falls within any HCAS zone under the official NHS Agenda for Change zone map. Pay here is the standard national Agenda for Change rate for your band and point.
What hospitals does this trust run? +
Its main adult inpatient hospitals are Mill View Hospital in Hove, Langley Green Hospital in Crawley, and Meadowfield Hospital in Worthing, alongside the Oaklands Centre for Acute Care in Chichester and a wide network of further community and specialist sites, including services in Haywards Heath, Eastbourne and Horsham. Coverage spans the whole of East Sussex, West Sussex and Brighton and Hove.
What is this trust known for beyond general adult mental health? +
It provides neurodevelopmental services (including autism and ADHD assessment) alongside standard adult, older adult and CAMHS mental health provision, and holds Veteran Aware Trust status, having passed its one-year review as of June 2026, recognising its ongoing work supporting the Armed Forces community. It also has research links with the Centre for Dementia Studies at Brighton and Sussex Medical School.
Should the difficult 2025 staff survey results put someone off applying here? +
That depends on what you value and which specific service or team you'd be joining — results at national scale don't tell you what a specific ward or team feels like day to day, and the trust's own leadership has publicly acknowledged the findings rather than dismissed them, which is itself a data point worth weighing. What we'd say plainly is that this is a trust where the current staff survey evidence is genuinely below sector average on multiple measures, at the same time it holds a CQC rating that includes Outstanding for caring — both facts are true, and worth holding together rather than picking whichever suits a decision you'd already made.
Are mental health nursing roles paid less than acute nursing roles at the same band? +
No. Agenda for Change bands and pay points apply identically regardless of specialty — a Band 6 mental health nurse here sits on exactly the same national pay point as a Band 6 adult nurse at a general acute trust, with the same absence of HCAS applying to both if their base location is outside any HCAS zone.

Free download: 2026/27 Agenda for Change pay scales

One page, every band, annual and hourly. We'll also send new application, interview and promotion guides as we publish them.

Free. Independent, not affiliated with the NHS. Every email has an unsubscribe link. See our privacy policy.