James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust: The Complete Guide

The trust and its hospital sites

James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust is, structurally, one of the simpler trusts covered on this site: a single acute hospital serving a large, dispersed coastal catchment, rather than a multi-site group formed by merger. It became the first NHS Foundation Trust in Norfolk and Suffolk on 1 August 2006, and today describes itself as the largest local employer on this stretch of the East Anglian coast, with over 4,000 staff serving a catchment population the trust itself puts at around 250,000 — a figure it expects to keep rising, particularly among people aged over 65, alongside tens of thousands of new homes planned across Norfolk and Suffolk.

The trust's own 2024/25 activity figures give a sense of genuine scale for a single-site DGH: 6,087 elective inpatient admissions, 36,346 day case procedures, 29,104 non-elective inpatient admissions, 288,113 outpatient attendances and 105,443 A&E attendances — well over 465,000 individual patient contacts across those categories in the year, all significant increases on 2022/23 and 2023/24. Since April 2025, James Paget has also sat within the new Norfolk and Waveney University Hospitals Group alongside Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals (NNUH) and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn — a shared, joint leadership arrangement across the three trusts, not a full merger. Each trust keeps its own board, its own CQC rating and, at the time of writing, its own employment contract, so a job at James Paget remains a job with this specific trust rather than the wider group.

What makes James Paget distinctive

It's easy to default to generic "district general hospital" language for a trust this size, so here's what's actually specific to James Paget:

• A genuinely single-site acute model for a large, dispersed catchment. Rather than spreading acute care across several hospitals, James Paget concentrates it on one site and pushes routine and outpatient work out to Lowestoft, the Newberry Centre and community services — a different working pattern from a multi-site trust, and one that means most acute specialties are staffed from a single team rather than split across locations.
• A dedicated hyperbaric chamber. The trust runs a hyperbaric oxygen therapy facility for ventilating and monitoring critically ill patients — a specialist regional service most district general hospitals of this size don't have in-house.
• Recent service expansion beyond core acute care. The trust's 2024/25 capital programme funded a new Orthopaedic Elective Hub, a Diagnostic Assessment Centre, a Community Diagnostics Centre and a Same Day Emergency Care facility — a genuine broadening of what's on offer beyond the traditional inpatient ward model, alongside continued investment in electronic patient records.
• A University Hospital in practice, not just in name. James Paget trains over a third of the medical students on the University of East Anglia's medical degree and also works with the University of Suffolk — a real academic link for a trust of this size, even though it doesn't carry the sub-specialty breadth of a large multi-site teaching trust.
• One of the country's priority RAAC rebuild hospitals. James Paget's current building is substantially constructed from reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete and is prioritised for full replacement under the national New Hospital Programme — a genuinely significant fact for anyone weighing up a long-term move here, covered in full in the next section — as part of a new three-trust regional leadership group with NNUH and The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn since April 2025, without merging into either.

The RAAC rebuild: current status

This is the single most material operational fact about James Paget for anyone considering a long-term move here. RAAC — reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete, a lightweight building material used widely in public-sector construction from the 1950s to the 1990s — has since been found prone to sudden, largely unpredictable structural failure. James Paget University Hospital is substantially built from RAAC, and is one of the hospitals nationally prioritised for a complete rebuild under the government's New Hospital Programme, grouped in the programme's "Wave 1" alongside The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn and West Suffolk Hospital in Bury St Edmunds.

Based on the trust's own 2024/25 Annual Report, the programme has moved through concrete milestones rather than staying at the announcement stage: a second-version Strategic Outline Case, aligned to the national "Hospital 2.0" standardised design approach, was completed in November 2024 and passed New Hospital Programme gateway assessments; Outline Business Case work is under way with submission planned in 2026; an indicative budget of £1–1.5 billion has been allocated to the project; and the trust has already completed a land purchase to the west of the current hospital, funded by £9.8m from the Department of Health and Social Care. The trust's own "Future Paget Vision" describes a new hospital of around 626 beds (including a dedicated "Concept Ward"), 100% single-patient rooms, and a net increase in bed capacity of roughly 75 beds — just over two additional wards — versus today.

On timing, the honest picture is: targeted, but not guaranteed. Public reporting on the wider New Hospital Programme points to main construction works for Wave 1 schemes, including James Paget, starting around 2027–28, with completion targeted for 2032–33. We'd treat that date as a planning target rather than a commitment: the programme as a whole has been formally reset and reviewed more than once since it was first announced in 2023, and national coverage has reported RAAC hospital replacement dates slipping past the programme's original ambition of substantial completion by 2030. Meanwhile the trust continues active RAAC mitigation on the existing building — £8.9m of capital spend on RAAC works in 2024/25 alone, part of a mitigation programme running since 2020/21 with £37.8m spent to March 2024 — standard practice for a RAAC-affected site awaiting rebuild, not a sign the current building is unmanaged.

CQC rating: an honest read

James Paget's CQC history is a genuine before-and-after story, worth walking through rather than quoting only the current headline. The trust held a Good overall rating through the 2010s — its last fully confirmed domain breakdown, from December 2019, was Safe: Requires Improvement, Effective: Good, Caring: Good, Responsive: Outstanding, Well-led: Good.

That changed following a CQC inspection of maternity services carried out on 10 January 2023. The CQC issued the trust with a Section 29A warning notice on 27 January 2023 — a formal notice requiring specific, urgent improvements — and its full report, published in May 2023, downgraded the trust's overall rating to Requires Improvement. Maternity itself was rated Inadequate on both the Safe and Well-led domains: inspectors found the maternity unit did not have enough staff to keep women and babies reliably safe, staff did not always control infection risks well, some women waited too long for treatment, and there was little evidence that managers were monitoring waiting times.

An unannounced focused re-inspection of maternity services in September 2025 assessed progress against that warning notice, and found enough improvement to raise maternity's Safe and Well-led domains from Inadequate to Requires Improvement. On the strength of that, the trust's overall CQC rating was published as Good on 1 April 2026. CQC's own commentary was measured rather than triumphant: it noted the improvements "need to be embedded and maintained," and flagged specific further work still required on bereavement support, the maternity triage phoneline, and record-keeping.

Staff survey: the honest picture

We'd rather report two years of real, primary-source data than a single flattering or unflattering headline. Both the 2024 and 2025 NHS Staff Survey results for James Paget, drawn directly from the NHS Staff Survey Coordination Centre's benchmark reports for this trust, tell broadly the same story: consistently below the acute-trust benchmark average, with little meaningful movement year on year.

In the 2025 survey, James Paget recorded 1,658 completed questionnaires — a 39% response rate, against a benchmarking group median of 47% across 121 comparable acute and acute-and-community trusts. Scores across all nine national People Promise elements and themes (each on a 0–10 scale) sat below the benchmark average on every single measure:

The 2024 survey (1,725 responses, a 40% response rate against a 49% benchmark median) shows the same pattern — below benchmark on every theme. We haven't found published significance-testing detail we could confirm, so we won't claim a "decline" beyond what the numbers plainly show: scores drifting marginally down on most themes, a persistent gap to benchmark, and a response rate running consistently several points below the group median.

Finances and governance

James Paget's financial position mirrors much of the wider NHS acute sector: real underlying pressure, managed to a formal breakeven, rather than a clean bill of health or a declared crisis. The trust reported a statutory deficit of £16.3m for 2024/25 (2023/24: £19.3m), including a £16.0m non-cash impairment charge; stripped of impairments the underlying deficit was just £0.3m. On the "control total" basis NHS England uses for in-year monitoring, the trust reported breakeven in both 2023/24 and 2024/25. Total operating income rose to £363.0m in 2024/25 from £327.0m the year before, and KPMG issued an unqualified audit opinion.

On governance, KPMG's Auditor's Annual Report for 2022/23 identified a significant weakness in value-for-money and governance arrangements, directly linked to the CQC's Section 29A notice on maternity. A year later, KPMG concluded the weakness "no longer exists," following substantial progress against the CQC's required actions — though not every action was fully signed off at that point. Read alongside the CQC's own 2026 rating and its caveat that maternity improvements still need sustaining, this is a trust that had a genuine, serious governance failing and responded with substantiated, auditor-verified improvement, without yet calling that improvement fully complete. Staff turnover of 6.2% (2024/25) was below the acute-trust average — a positive sitting alongside, not resolving, the harder history above.

Pay and HCAS at James Paget

Every Agenda for Change band at James Paget matches the national scale exactly — see our 2026/27 pay scales guide. High Cost Area Supplement (HCAS) is defined by specific postcode zones in and immediately around London (inner, outer and fringe), not by a region's cost of living, rurality, or distance from a major city. Great Yarmouth, Lowestoft and the wider Norfolk/Suffolk/Waveney catchment sit well outside all of those zones, so pay here is the standard national Agenda for Change rate, identical band-for-band to any other non-HCAS trust in England. Doctors and dentists sit outside Agenda for Change entirely, on their own national contract, which doesn't change based on location either.

James Paget University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, not the NHS as a single organisation, is your legal employer if you work here, which is what continuous service and, where relevant, redundancy pay calculations are based on. As a general acute trust it covers the usual full range of roles — nursing, medicine, midwifery, allied health professions, pharmacy, healthcare science, and the healthcare assistant, admin and estates staff needed to run a busy single- site acute hospital and its satellite services. Our medicine and nursing guides walk through how pay progresses at each band, and that applies here as much as at any other acute trust.

James Paget vs Norfolk and Norwich: comparing two Norfolk and Waveney trusts

The most natural comparator for James Paget isn't a similarly RAAC-affected trust elsewhere in the country — it's Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals (NNUH), its direct partner in the new Norfolk and Waveney University Hospitals Group and the region's larger neighbouring acute trust. Both sit outside HCAS zones and both refer their most serious trauma cases onward to Cambridge University Hospitals, but they differ substantially in scale, structure and recent CQC history.

The headline: James Paget is a genuinely smaller, single-site operation built around one main hospital and a few satellite services, while NNUH runs at roughly double the bed count and more than double the staffing across a wider tertiary specialist and academic remit. On current CQC ratings, James Paget's Good (April 2026) sits above NNUH's Requires Improvement — but that comparison needs the fuller context both pages give: James Paget's rating follows a serious, well-documented maternity safety failing that took over two years to resolve, while NNUH's rating reflects a longer-running pattern of hovering around Requires Improvement without a single finding of that severity. Neither trust is objectively the "safer" choice on ratings alone — the right fit depends on specialty, site, and the specific department you'd be joining. See our Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals guide for the fuller picture on that trust.

Training, research and career progression

James Paget's academic link with the University of East Anglia — training over a third of UEA's medical students — and its working relationship with the University of Suffolk give it genuine teaching credentials for a trust of this size, even though its single-site, general-acute structure means it doesn't offer the same breadth of tertiary sub-specialty rotation you'd find at a larger multi-site teaching trust like NNUH or Cambridge. What it does offer is broad, hands-on general acute exposure across medicine, surgery, emergency care, maternity and the elective services recently expanded through its capital investment programme (the new Orthopaedic Elective Hub, Diagnostic Assessment Centre, Community Diagnostics Centre and Same Day Emergency Care facility) — useful for clinicians and allied health professionals who want broad general experience without the scale and internal complexity of a much larger trust.

The honest caveat that applies throughout this page applies here too: a trust recovering from a serious maternity safety finding, sitting on two years of below-benchmark staff survey results, and awaiting a rebuild of RAAC-affected estate is not necessarily a worse place to build a career — but it is a trust where asking direct questions about support, staffing levels and the specific department's own recent CQC and staff survey history is more useful here than at a trust without that recent history. Current or recent staff in the specific team you'd be joining are a better source for that than any trust-wide statistic, including the ones on this page.

Compare trusts and tools

Related pages

Frequently asked questions