NHS Pension

LGPS vs NHS Pension: Funded vs Unfunded Difference

FP FrontlinePay Editorial
Updated September 2026

Independent guidance — not affiliated with NHS England or DHSC

Short answer

The NHS Pension Scheme and Local Government Pension Scheme (LGPS) are both CARE defined benefit schemes with a broadly similar accrual mechanic, but one structural difference sets them apart: the NHS Pension Scheme is unfunded (pay-as-you-go, backed centrally by the Treasury), while the LGPS is a genuinely funded scheme — each of its roughly 86 local funds holds real invested assets against its liabilities, with employer contribution rates set locally based on that fund's own funding position. The LGPS banks 1/49th of pay each year (CPI-only revaluation, no added margin) versus the NHS Scheme's 1/54th (CPI+1.5%). This matters most for public health, community health and outsourced NHS support staff who may be LGPS members without realising the scheme works differently underneath.

Budget day, 28 October: what it means for your NHS Pension

On 28 October we will email you what was announced and what it means for NHS Pension members.

Free. Every email has an unsubscribe link. See our privacy policy.

This comparison is relevant to a specific, often-confused group: NHS staff considering a move into a council-employed community or public health role (or the reverse), and anyone who already works alongside NHS colleagues but is actually an LGPS member because of who legally employs them — local authority public health teams, some outsourced NHS support services, and non-NHS staff working within integrated health and care settings. The LGPS is structured differently enough from the NHS Pension Scheme that it's worth understanding the real mechanics, not just assuming "another public sector pension" means "the same scheme."

This is independent guidance, not financial advice — FrontlinePay is not affiliated with NHS England, NHS Pensions, the Local Government Association, any individual LGPS administering fund, or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Funded vs unfunded: the structural difference

This is the single biggest difference between the two schemes, and it's a genuinely different financing model, not just different numbers plugged into the same structure.

The NHS Pension Scheme is unfunded — also called "pay-as-you-go." No central pot of invested assets sits behind it; instead, today's member and employer contributions are used to pay today's pensioners, with the government (ultimately the taxpayer) standing behind the scheme's long-term ability to pay. This is the same financing model used by most other large UK public sector schemes — the Civil Service pension, the Teachers' Pension Scheme, the Police and Firefighters' schemes.

The LGPS is funded — the major exception among the large UK public sector schemes. It's administered through around 86 separate regional pension funds across England and Wales (plus separate arrangements in Scotland and Northern Ireland), each of which actually holds and invests contributions in real assets — equities, bonds, property and more — to meet its own members' future pension liabilities. Investment returns on those assets, not just ongoing contributions, are a genuine part of how LGPS benefits get paid for.

NHS Pension Scheme — unfunded

No invested asset pot. Today's contributions pay today's pensions, backed by the ongoing ability of the public sector to pay as benefits fall due. Employer contribution rate set centrally and uniformly.

LGPS — funded

Around 86 separate regional funds genuinely invest contributions in real assets to meet future liabilities. Employer contribution rates set locally per fund (and sometimes per employer) following each fund's own triennial actuarial valuation.

Why funded vs unfunded actually matters in practice

For an individual member's own promised benefit, this difference generally doesn't change what you're owed — both schemes pay a defined, formula-based pension regardless of investment performance or Treasury finances, and neither has ever failed to pay. Where it does matter in practice is at the employer and system level:

  • • LGPS employer contribution rates vary by fund and by employer — determined by each fund's own triennial valuation (assessing its actual invested assets against its projected liabilities), rather than a single centrally-set rate applied uniformly. A well-funded LGPS fund can set a lower employer rate than a less well-funded one; average employer rates across LGPS funds have themselves moved meaningfully over recent valuation cycles as funding positions have improved
  • • This matters directly for TUPE and outsourcing — when a council service (or part of an NHS support service run by a local authority) is outsourced to a private contractor, the LGPS has well-established mechanisms (such as 'admitted body' status) for the contractor to continue providing LGPS membership, something the unfunded NHS Pension Scheme's structure doesn't need in the same way since there's no fund-specific solvency position to protect in an outsourcing
  • • NHS Pension Scheme costs are managed centrally through Treasury-level mechanisms (including a 'cost cap' process reviewing scheme costs periodically against a target), rather than through a visible local funding level the way an LGPS fund's own valuation is
  • • Neither structure changes your own accrued benefit entitlement — this is a financing and employer-contribution-rate difference, not a difference in what either scheme is legally obliged to pay you as a member

Accrual rate and revaluation, compared

Both schemes are CARE (Career Average Revalued Earnings) arrangements, so the year-by-year mechanic is the same shape: bank a slice of pension each year based on that year's actual pensionable pay, then revalue the running total annually. The specific numbers differ, and so does what the revaluation is linked to:

NHS Pension Scheme (2015 Section)

Banks 1/54th of pensionable pay each year, revalued at CPI+1.5% — CPI plus an added margin.

LGPS

Banks 1/49th of pensionable pay each year, revalued each 6 April in line with CPI only — no added margin on top.

Taken as raw fractions, 1/49th looks more generous than 1/54th — but the NHS Scheme's added revaluation margin works in the opposite direction over a career, since it compounds on the entire existing pot, not just each year's new slice. Here's an illustrative comparison for the same hypothetical member in each scheme — 23 years to Normal Pension Age, a flat £35,000 of pensionable pay throughout:

NHS Pension Scheme

£19,823.24/yr

1/54th accrual, CPI+1.5% revaluation, 23 years at £35,000 pensionable pay

LGPS

£18,368.79/yr

1/49th accrual, CPI-only revaluation (illustrated at 1.0%), 23 years at £35,000 pensionable pay

ℹThis comparison is sensitive to an assumption you can't know in advance: future CPI

This example uses an illustrative long-run CPI assumption of 1.0% a year for the LGPS side (so the NHS Scheme's CPI+1.5% comes out at 2.5%, matching the planning assumption used elsewhere on this site) purely to show the mechanic — real inflation moves around far more than a flat assumption, and both schemes' actual revaluation each year depends on the real CPI figure at the time, not this illustration. The reasonable takeaway is that a bigger accrual fraction alone doesn't tell you which scheme produces more pension over a career — the revaluation basis matters just as much, especially over 20+ years. It isn't a reliable basis for predicting which scheme will actually pay more for your own career. To see what your own NHS pension could look like, try our NHS pension forecast calculator.

Normal Pension Age and the 50/50 option

Like the NHS Scheme, LGPS Normal Pension Age for CARE service is generally your State Pension age — with one specific floor worth knowing: LGPS Normal Pension Age cannot be lower than 65, even for anyone whose State Pension age happens to work out below that. The NHS Pension Scheme's 2015 Section ties Normal Pension Age purely to State Pension age with no equivalent floor.

The LGPS also offers a feature the NHS Pension Scheme doesn't have a direct equivalent of: the 50/50 option. An LGPS member can elect to pay half their normal contribution rate in exchange for building up pension at half the normal accrual rate (1/98th instead of 1/49th), while keeping full life cover and ill health protection unaffected. It's designed as a lower-cost middle ground for members going through a temporary affordability squeeze, without the drastic step of opting out of the scheme (and its death and ill health protections) entirely. The NHS Pension Scheme's own equivalent affordability question is generally framed as a binary — stay in fully, or opt out — which our Is It Worth Opting Out of the NHS Pension? guide covers in full, and Can I pay less into the NHS pension? sets out the real options.

LGPS Normal Pension Age Floor

65

LGPS Normal Pension Age is your State Pension age, but never lower than 65 — the NHS 2015 Section has no equivalent floor

Who actually moves between these two schemes

In practice, this comparison matters most for a specific set of career moves rather than the general NHS workforce:

  • • Public health staff — public health specialists and teams moved from NHS to local authority employment in 2013, generally moving from the NHS Pension Scheme into the LGPS as part of that transfer, even though the work remains health-focused
  • • Community and integrated care roles — some community health, social care-adjacent and integrated neighbourhood roles sit with a local authority employer rather than an NHS trust, and so sit in the LGPS
  • • Outsourced NHS support services — catering, cleaning, portering, estates and similar support functions run by a local authority or a contractor under 'admitted body' arrangements can be LGPS rather than NHS Pension Scheme, depending on the specific employment and contracting structure
  • • Anyone unsure which scheme they're actually in — check your payslip, your pension scheme member ID, or ask your employer's HR or payroll team directly; scheme membership follows your legal employer, not simply where you physically work or what kind of work you do

Why trust this guide

  • ✓ Explains the funded-vs-unfunded difference in plain terms and what it actually changes in practice (employer contribution rates, TUPE/outsourcing mechanics) rather than just stating it as trivia
  • ✓ Confirms the LGPS's genuine structural features — the 65 Normal Pension Age floor, the 50/50 option, locally-set employer contribution rates — that don't have a direct NHS Pension Scheme equivalent
  • ✓ Shows the accrual-rate vs revaluation-margin trade-off with a transparent worked example rather than letting the raw 1/49th vs 1/54th fractions imply a false 'LGPS wins' conclusion
  • ✓ Independent and not affiliated with NHS England, NHS Pensions, the Local Government Association, any LGPS fund or the DHSC — this is planning context, not financial advice

Get notified when NHS or LGPS pension figures update

We'll email you when accrual rates, employer contribution rates, or transfer rules change in either scheme.

Free. Independent, not affiliated with the NHS. Every email has an unsubscribe link. See our privacy policy.

Frequently asked questions

Why would an NHS employee ever end up in the LGPS instead of the NHS Pension Scheme? +
Mainly through employer, not job content. Pension scheme membership generally follows who legally employs you, not what kind of health or care work you do. Public health specialists and some community health roles transferred to local authority employment in 2013 moved into the LGPS rather than staying in the NHS Pension Scheme, even though the work itself is health-related. Similarly, some outsourced NHS support services (catering, cleaning, estates) run by a council or a company under a service contract can sit in the LGPS. If you're unsure which scheme you're actually in, check your payslip or ask your employer's HR team directly rather than assuming it follows the type of work you do.
Is a funded scheme like the LGPS 'safer' than the NHS Pension Scheme's unfunded, pay-as-you-go model? +
Not in the sense of your benefits being less secure — both are statutory public sector pension schemes with benefits set out in law, and an unfunded scheme isn't 'unsafe' simply because it doesn't hold a pot of invested assets; it's backed by the ongoing ability of the public sector (ultimately the taxpayer) to pay pensions as they fall due, which has never failed to pay for either scheme. The practical difference is more about *how costs are managed and who bears funding-level risk* — the LGPS tracks a real pot of assets against real liabilities, with employer contribution rates adjusted locally based on how well-funded a specific LGPS fund actually is, while NHS Pension Scheme costs are managed centrally through the Treasury's own mechanisms rather than a visible local funding level.
Can I Club transfer between the NHS Pension Scheme and the LGPS? +
The LGPS, like the NHS Pension Scheme and Teachers' Pension Scheme, participates in the Public Sector Transfer Club, which in principle allows a transfer on Club terms (broadly, equivalent service credit rather than a standard cash transfer value) when moving between Club schemes within the usual conditions — generally a break of no more than 5 years, applied for within 12 months of joining the new scheme. Confirm current eligibility and terms directly with the LGPS fund you'd be transferring into (since LGPS is administered through numerous separate local funds, not one single national body) before assuming your specific move qualifies.
Does the LGPS's 50/50 option have any equivalent in the NHS Pension Scheme? +
Not directly. The LGPS's 50/50 section — pay half your normal contribution rate and accrue pension at half the normal rate, while keeping full life cover and ill health protection — is a specific LGPS affordability feature introduced to give members a lower-cost alternative to opting out entirely. The NHS Pension Scheme doesn't offer a direct equivalent ongoing half-contribution option: broadly, your choice is full scheme membership or opting out entirely (see our opt-out guide), though NHS partial retirement from age 55 offers a different kind of flexibility once you're actually drawing benefits rather than as an ongoing contribution-reduction option while still building up your pension.
If I have service in both the NHS Pension Scheme and the LGPS, how do they combine at retirement? +
They don't combine into one calculation — each scheme pays its own pension under its own rules, based on your service and pay record in that specific scheme, unless you've completed a Club transfer to consolidate service into a single scheme beforehand. Without a transfer, you'd generally draw two separate pensions, each with its own Normal Pension Age and payment terms.
Is the LGPS's employer contribution rate really different from the NHS Pension Scheme's? +
Yes, structurally. The NHS Pension Scheme's employer contribution rate is set centrally and applies uniformly across NHS employers. LGPS employer contribution rates are set locally, fund by fund, following each fund's own triennial actuarial valuation, and can vary meaningfully between different LGPS funds and even between different employers within the same fund, depending on that employer's specific funding position and risk profile. This doesn't generally affect what you receive as a member — your benefits are defined by the same formula regardless of your specific employer's contribution rate — but it is a real structural difference in how the two schemes are financed.

Budget day, 28 October: what it means for your NHS Pension

We'll email you on the day with what was announced and what it means for NHS Pension members. You also get the free PDF now.

Free. Independent, not affiliated with the NHS. Every email has an unsubscribe link. See our privacy policy.